Intersubjective Consistency of Knowledge and Belief

نویسندگان

  • Giacomo Bonanno
  • Klaus Nehring
چکیده

We consider interactive epistemic models where individuals are described by both their “knowledge” and their “beliefs”. Three intersubjective consistency conditions are examined: Intersubjective Caution (if an individual believes something to be common belief then he knows it to be common belief), Truth of Common Belief (only true facts are commonly believed) and Qualitative Agreement. These conditions are employed in characterizations of the following properties which describe either the extent of intersubjective truth and/or the logic of common belief: common belief in no error, common knowledge of common belief, negative introspection of common belief, coincidence of common knowledge and common belief, and collapse of individual belief and knowledge. We also discuss to what extent the three fundamental conditions can be viewed as intersubjective rationality conditions.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Consistency Reasoning in Neural-Logic Belief Networks

In this technical report, we argue that human belief can be contradictory and to maintain consistency for knowledge reasoning purposes, it is more natural to sort out connicting beliefs by their relative strengths similar to how they are handled by our commonsense. Based on this philosophy, two notions of logical consistency (general and strong) that are semantically weaker than classical logic...

متن کامل

A Pragmatic Solution to the Value Problem of Knowledge

We value possessing knowledge more than true belief. Both someone with knowledge and someone with a true belief possess the correct answer to a question. Why is knowledge more valuable than true belief if both contain the correct answer? I examine the philosophy of American pragmatist John Dewey and then I offer a novel solution to this question often called the value problem of knowledge. I pr...

متن کامل

A consistency-based framework for merging knowledge bases

We present a framework for expressing various merging operators for belief sets. This framework generalises our earlier work on consistency-based belief revision and contraction. Two primary merging operators are identified: in the first approach, belief sources are consistently combined so that the result of merging knowledge bases K1, . . . ,Kn is a maximal consistent (if possible) set of for...

متن کامل

Abstract Deictic Gestures-in-Interaction: A Barometer of Intersubjective Knowledge Development in Small-Group Discussion

Deictic Gestures-in-Interaction: A Barometer of Intersubjective Knowledge Development in Small-Group Discussion

متن کامل

An Introduction to Belief Revision and Knowledge Representation with 2CNF

The aim of this paper is to show an introduction to the calculation of belief revision that expresses knowledge by a 2CNF. This procedure basically consists of adding a new belief expressed by a clause 2CNF, into the set of beliefs of a knowledge database, preserving its consistency. This generally implies having to remove some clauses from previous knowledge. The strategy employed to remove pr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998